AI-designed catalog images for Meta Advantage+ ads.

Meta's Advantage+ catalog ads (formerly DPA — Dynamic Product Ads) automatically pick which product to show each user based on their browsing signal. The creative itself comes from your feed'sg:image_linkfield — Meta uses that image, with optional overlays.

Brands that ship branded, on-message catalog images consistently outperform brands that use raw product photos. Marpipe, Cropink, and Confect have all built businesses on this premise. The problem: their tools cost €100–500/month and target enterprise. Emberfeed brings the same capability — AI-designed templates per product — at ~€20/month.

Staticmeans whatever's in your product feed's image_link field gets shown to users. Same image for everyone, no overlays, no brand consistency across SKUs.

Dynamic means Emberfeed rewrites the image_linkURL to point at our renderer, which composites your template with this specific product's data. The user sees a polished, on-brand image. Meta sees a normal image URL — they don't care it's generated server-side.

• Price overlays — automatically updated when your prices change. Show original + sale price together for discount-heavy catalogs.
• Badges — "Sale", "New", "Bestseller", conditionally shown based on feed fields like sale_price, custom_label_0, or stock level.
• Brand frame — a consistent border, gradient, or texture wrapping every product so your ads are recognisable in feed.
• Logo — placed once in the template, applied across every product without manual placement per SKU.
• AI-cut backgrounds — remove cluttered photo backgrounds for fashion/jewelry catalogs. Built in, no external service.
• Multi-image layouts — show 4 angles of the same product, lifestyle + studio shot side by side, or before/after compositions.

• →Recommended size: 1024×1024+ for Advantage+ (Meta upscales aggressively below that).
• →Aspect ratio: 1:1 square is the safest default — works in feed, Stories crops, Reels crops, and the Shop tab.
• →Promotional overlays: Meta restricts overlays in some placements (specifically the catalog product image used in some Reels formats). Test before scaling — Emberfeed's validation catches placements that won't accept your template.
• →File size: Keep under 8 MB. Emberfeed compresses to JPEG at sane quality so this is rarely a problem.
• →Required feed fields: id, title, description, availability, condition, price, link, image_link, brand. Emberfeed's validator checks every product against this list before you ship.

Cropink's entry tier is $39/month (≤100 products) and scales up from there. Marpipe runs from $199/month (Startup) to $999+/month (Enterprise). Confect publishes $299 / $499 / $999 tiers. None of them combine feed editing with AI-designed image templates per product — most expect you to hand-design each layout in their GUI.

Emberfeed is built around three constraints: (1) AI does the initial layout from a description, (2) one tool covers feed editing AND image generation, (3) pricing matches small e-shops and one-off campaign tests. Result: ~€20/month per feed. First 6 months free up to 1,000 products.